Author: Akanksh Deekonda, NLIU-Bhopal Munn v. Illinois: Case comment Citation: 94 U.S. 113 (1876). Petitioner: A grain warehouse company in Illinois by the name “Munn and Scott” Respondent: The State of Illinois Date of Judgement: Mar 1, 1877 Facts: There are fields with the grain on the west. This has to be taken to the east by
Case: Smt. Sitabai and Another V. Ramchandra Court: The Supreme Court of India Bench: J.C Shah (Acting C.J.) and V. Ramaswami and A.N. Grover, JJ Decided on: August 20th, 1969 Citation: 1969(2) SCC 544 Facts: The first appellant was the widow of Bhagirath who predeceased his elder brother Dhulichand in 1930. An illegitimate son named
Author: Shreya Chakraborty, Amity Law School Case:Jijabai Vitharao Gajre V. Pathankhan and Ors. Court: The Supreme Court of India Bench: J.M. ShelatAnd C.A. Vaidialingam, JJ Decided on: September 1, 1970 Citation: 1970 (2) SCC 717 Facts: The judgment was delivered by the apex court in the instant case, the appellant was the daughter of Champatrao.
CASE COMMENT Author: Kunwar Bir Singh, UILS, Panjab University, Chandigarh Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Khushwaha & AnotherSLP (Civil) No.15071 of 2009) BENCH: G.S. Singhvi, Asok Kumar Ganguly PETITIONER/ APPELLANT Chanmuniya RESPONDENT: Virendra Kumar Singh Khushwaha and Another Date of Judgment: 7th October 2010 Facts: One Sarju Singh had two sons, Ram Saran and Virendra
CASE COMMENT Author: Kunwar Bir Singh, UILS, Panjab University, Chandigarh Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh Chowdhary, AIR 1984 Delhi 66 BENCH: A Rohatgi PETITIONER/ APPELLANT: Harvinder Kaur RESPONDENT: Harmander Singh Chowdhary Date of Judgment: 15th November 1983 Facts: The appellant, Harvinder Kaur was married to the respondent, Harmandar Singh Choudhry on October 10th, 1976. Both
CASE COMMENT Author: Kunwar Bir Singh, UILS, Panjab University, Chandigarh Joseph Shine v. Union of India WP (Crl.) 194/2017 BENCH: Indu Malhotra, D.Y. Chandrachud, Ajay Manikrao Khanwilkar, Rohinton Nariman, Dipak Misra PETITIONER: Joseph Shine RESPONDENT: Union of India Date of Judgement: 27/09/2018 Facts: Joseph Shine, a non-resident from the state of Kerala, filed a PIL
Author: Priya Shah, GLS Law College DIEBOLD SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. VS THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES Citations: ILR 2005 KAR 2210, 2006 144 STC 59 Kar Decided on: 31 January 2005 FACTS The appellant is a public limited company engaged in the manufacture and supply of Automated Teller Machines (ATM’s for short). In view of the
P.R. TRANSPORT AGENCY V. UNION OF INDIA (2005): CASE COMMENT Author: Pavitra M, School of Law, SASTRA Deemed University Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: S Harkauli, U Pandey Decided on: 24TH September 2005 Citation: AIR 2006 All 23 FACTS: In the case at hand, an e-auction was held by Bharat Coking Coal (hereinafter referred to
MOHORI BIBEE v. DHARMODAS GHOSE (1903): CASE COMMENT Author: Ankita Karn, REVA University, Bangalore Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903): Case Comments Appellant: Mohori Bibee Respondent: Dharmodas Ghose Advocate for Appellant: Watkins Advocate for Respondent: W.W. Box Court: Calcutta High Court Judge: Lord McNaughton, Lord Davey, Lord Lindley, Sir Ford Noth, Sir Andrew Scoble, Sir
PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF GB V. BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS (SOUTHERN) LTD: Case Comment Author: Rudrabhishek Chauhan, School of Law, Galgotias University. Court: Court of Appeal of England and Wales [1953] 1 QB 401 Date: 5th February, 1953. Facts: On April 13, 1951, two clients ingested meds from a rack in a drug store, put it in their
Author: Rudrabhishek Chauhan, School of Law, Galgotias University. Court: The Supreme Court of India AIR 1975 1534 Decided On: 19/03/1975 Facts: The appellant is Narayan Ganesh Dastane, a proficient and qualified man who worked on various exercises on a national and worldwide level. The Respondent is Sucheta who is a learned woman whose father capacities as
Author- Pallav vats, Geeta Institute of Law, Panipat. Case comment Vishaka&Ors. V/S State of Rajasthan (Air 1997 Sc 3011) – Sexual Harassment Landmark Case Bench Of Judges: CJI, Sujata V. Manohar, B. N. Kirpal Vishaka & ors. v/s state of Rajasthan[1]is a case which deals with the evil of Sexual Harassment of women at her
D.K. BASU V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL Author: Mr. Badal Khurana, JIMS School of Law Court Before the Supreme Court of India Decided on 18.12.1996 Bench Kuldip Singh and A.S.Anand JJ In this case, the main parties were Shri DK Basu and the State of West Bengal. This case revolved around
MOHD. ASLAM VS UNION OF INDIA Author: Ms. Jyoti Jha, JEMTEC, School of Law In the case of MOHD ASLAM VS UNION OF INDIA the petitioner (MOHD ASLAM) filed a contempt petition against the respondent (Shri Kalyan Singh), then Chief Minister that he willfully disobeyed the court’s order. There was a prior case in which
