Nitya Shukla, 2nd year, ICFAI University,Dehradun Name of the case: Mukesh & Another vs State for NCT of Delhi Citation: (2017) 6 Supreme Court Cases 1: (2017) 2 Supreme Court Cases (Cri) 673: 2017 SCC Online SC 533 Court: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Date of Judgment: 5 MAY 2017 Parties Involved: Appellant: Mukesh & Anr
Author: Aeshita Marwah, a student of University of Petroleum and Energy Studies Case commentary: Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain Bench: Krishnaiyer, V.R. Petitioner: Indira Nehru Gandhi (Smt.) Vs. Respondent: Raj Narain & Anr. Date of Judgment: 24/06/1975 Citation: 1975 AIR 1590 1975 SCC (2) 159 For many reasons, the case of Indira Gandhi v. Raj
Author: Aditi Saboo College: University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIACASE NO.: WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 356 OF 1977APPELANT: MINERVA MILLS LTD. AND ITS SHAREHOLDERSRESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIACITATION: AIR 1980 SC 1789JUDGES: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD (CHIEF JUSTICE), P.N. BHAGWATI, A.C. GUPTA, N.L. UNTWALIA, P.S. KAILASAM. INTRODUCTIONThe case of Minerva mills vs. Union
Author: Samay Jain College: Institute of Law, Nirma University Court- Calcutta High Court Case No – 72 of 1969 Appellant – Rural Transport Services Respondents – Bezlum Bibi Equivalent Citation – AIR 1980 Cal 165, 84 CWN 616 Honorable Judges / Coram – A K Sen, B Chakrabarti Introduction The Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, primarily
Ashutosh Tiwari, Mumbai University Thane Campus COURT The Supreme Court of India provided the judgment on this case CASE NUMBER Writ Petition (Civil) 135 of 1970 APPELLANT His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and Others RESPONDENT The state of Kerala and Anr. CITATIONS JUDGES Thirteen judges’ bench of Supreme Court that decided this case comprised: S.M.
Author: Rishi Tibrewal, Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University Court – Supreme Court of India Case Number – 4412 and 4413 of 1985 Appellant – Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited and Ors. Respondent – Brojo Nath Ganguly and Ors. Citation – 1986 AIR 1571, 1986 SCR (2) 278 Bench/Judges – Justice D.P. Madon , Justice
Author: Malvika Sharma, Law College Dehradun. Case Name: NALSA V. UNION OF INDIA& Ors Court: Supreme Court of India Date: 15 April 2014 Citation: 2014 5 SCC 438 Bench: K.S. Radhakrishnan, A.K. Sikri Petitioner: National Legal Service Authority Respondents: Union of India & Ors INTRODUCTION On 9 November 1995 under the Legal Service Authority Act
Author- Siddharth Shankar Singh Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Patiala Specifics of the Case: · Court: Kings Bench Division · Case Number: 284 · Appellant: Mr. Powell · Respondent: Mr. Lee · Citation: (1908) 99 LT 284 Introduction: A/c to The Indian contract act, 1872: A contract is, in a nutshell, an agreement that could be enforced by the
Case Analysis on: Sakal Papers (P) Ltd., And Others vs The Union Of India CASE NAME: Sakal Papers (P) Ltd., And Others vs The Union Of India COURT: Supreme Court Of India JURISDICTION: Original Jurisdiction Of the Supreme Court Under article 32 of constitution of India. CASE NO.: Petitions nos. 331 of 1960 and 67-68
Author: Anisha Tak, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab Court– Court of Common Pleas Case Number– 35 of 1862 Appellant– Paul Felthouse Respondent– William Bindley Citation– [1862] EWHC CP J35 Judges– Honourable Willes J., Byles J. and Keating J. Introduction Felthouse v. Bindley is a landmark judgment that dealt with the question of acceptance
Author: Nandinee Singh, Amity Law School, Noida. Court: Supreme Court of India Full case name: M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. Decided: 20 December 1986 Citation(s): 1987 SCR (1) 819; AIR 1987 965 Appellant: M.C. Mehta Vs. Respondent: UOI and others Judges sitting: P.N. Bhagwati (Chief Justice), G.L. Misra Rangnath Oza, M.M.
Author: Shreyansh Rathi, Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Patiala Court: Court of Appeal of England And Wales (Civil Division) Appellant: Mr. Balfour Respondent: Mrs. Balfour Equivalent Citations: (1919) 2 KB 571 Judges: Lord Justice Warrington, Lord Justice Duke, LordJustice Atkin Introduction Intention to create Legal Relations is one of the most important essentials of
Author: Sakshi Tulsyan, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun Court- High Court of Andhra Pradesh Case Number- Cri. Petn. Nos. 2601 and 2602 of 2003 Petitioners- Syed Asifuddin and others Respondent– State of Madhya Pradesh Citation- 2005 Cri LJ 4314 Judge- Justice V.V.S Rao Facts The Reliance Infocomm Ltd., under the scheme of Dhirubhai Ambani Pioneer,
M/S VOLTAS LTD BOMBAY VS UNION OF INDIA &ORS Author- Stuti Agarwal, School of Law, Christ (Deemed to be University) Court- Supreme Court of India Case No 2252 of 1994 Appellant – Voltas Limited, Bombay Respondents – Union of India (UOI) & Ors. Equivalent Citation – 1995 AIR 1881, 1995 SCC Sulp. (2) 498 Honourable
