Refugee Law and Policy in India

REFUGEE LAW AND POLICY IN INDIA

Author: Divya Vishal

INTRODUCTION

India has had a well-established custom of giving security to displaced people. It has followed an exceptionally liberal policy for refugees. The definition of a refugee as per Refugee convention is as follows, “any person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or unwilling to avail protection of that country.”[1] The lack of a proper refugee enactment can be ascribed to India’s unpredictable circumstance in South Asian governmental issues and the dangers of terrorism that it has to face. Indeed, even in such nonattendance of a particular law, India has tended to the necessities of exiles who have fled from their home nation into its region.

India in spite of the fact that isn’t a signatory of the 1951 Refugee convention however it has endorsed various other treaties related to human rights which ensures commitments to give insurance to displaced people or refugees. Some of them are Universal Revelation of Human Rights 1948 (Art.14) UN Declaration on Territorial Asylum 1967, International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR Art.13). These settlements force a positive obligation on India to ensure the security of refugees as long as they dread oppression because of their govt. No law can be categorized and prohibited to regard the refugee’s human rights. There are a lot of issues related to the current status of refugee law in India like a developing country like India i.e. itself fighting with issues of providing essentials to the public is loaded with additional problems like refugees and also there is no specific law or policy dealing with it unanimously.

CURRENT STATUS OF REFUGEE LAW AND POLICY IN INDIA

India has suffered Refugee Influx many times in its history. Firstly, this happened at the time partition of India and Pakistan. Another instance was when Dalai Lama in 1959 along with his devotees and supporters escaped and took exile in India. In 1971, India received a huge refugee influx from East-Pakistan. It has also been affected by the refugees from Bangladesh, Srilanka. The most recent influx of refugees can be seen in the issue of the Rohingyas community from Myanmar.

India doesn’t have on its own separate law to administer the status of refugees. Without such a particular law, all current Indian laws like I.P.C, CrPc, The Evidence Act, and most importantly Constitutional law apply to the refugees also. Article 21 of the Constitution centers around the security of human rights of all citizens as well as non-citizens. Despite the fact that India isn’t a part of the 1951 Refugee Convention or its 1967 convention, even doesn’t have a national displaced person assurance system, yet at the same time it keeps on offering shelters to exiles of the neighboring nations. The refugee status can be given to the asylum seekers from UNHCR if the status isn’t secured by the Indian Government.

India never became a party to the 1951 Convention in light of the fact that, as R.K. Nehru, foreign secretary at the time put it in 1953, it was viewed as Euro-driven and coordinated against the socialist states. Incomprehensibly, similar to Pakistan, India is on the UNHCR advisory group yet not limited by the Convention. It is India’s belief that every refugee is given “some” relief despite it being a non-signatory country.[2] This doesn’t imply that it can embrace any approach it wants since it is as yet limited by the human rights arrangements to which it is a signatory.

Human Rights law manages clashes and Refugee law manages individuals fleeing from clashes. A strong human rights mechanism in the host nation determines what solutions will be offered during the refugee crisis; it governs how well or unwell the refugees will be treated and what kind of rights will they get.[3] Refugee law comes into the picture to protect the distressed during armed conflicts because of the indiscriminate killing and destruction of the property of civilians.[4] These individuals must choose the option to escape out of dread or abuse since they no longer avail of security or protection from the parent government. Therefore, both the Human Rights law and the Refugee framework overlap each other. The overseeing rule concerning the treatment of oppressed refugees is the standard of non-refoulement. This principle says that no mistreated refugee must be departed to any nation where they are at risk to confront abuse and torment. Notwithstanding this guideline, there is an obligation to think about giving any such individual asylum, and afterward giving refuge if the circumstances identifying with their abuse are valid. Oppression isn’t assumed however needs verification. Thus, on account of India, the choice as to whether to treat an individual or a gathering of people as refugees or not is assumed as per the facts and circumstances of the cases.

LEGAL PROVISIONS DEALING WITH ISSUES OF REFUGEES IN INDIA

There were acts that dealt with refugees before the partition of India and before Constitution of India came into operation like East Punjab Evacuees Act, 1947; East Punjab Refugees (Registration of Land Claims) Act, 1948, Mysore Administration of Evacuee Property (Second Emergency) Act, 1949, etc. Then there were acts that were enacted the after the constitution of India came into force:- Influx from Pakistan (Control) Repelling Act, 1952; Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation) Act, 1954; Foreigners Law (Application & Amendment) Act, 1962; Refugee Relief Taxes (Abolition) Act, 1973, etc.

The constitutional provisions for refugees are included in Article 14, 21, 22, 25-28, 32 and 226 of the constitution. The court in the case of Louis De Raedt v. Union of India[5] held that even non- citizens have the fundamental right to life, liberty, and dignity. This right of life is followed by the right against arrest and detention.[6] The Guwahati High Court ordered interim bail for refugees from Burma who were confined and the court was chivalrous in not demanding neighborhood guarantees. [7]

Also, the courts have given a liberal translation in detainment cases with the goal that the UNHCR can decide the status of the refugee.[8] The Court maintained that food and clinical facilities ought to be given to convicts as they are the absolute minimum basics for endurance. The refugees are also offered rights to profess and affirm their own religion subject to sensible limitations that are appropriate to everybody including aliens. They are given the privilege to have peaceful assembly and establish institutions for education.

Rights ensured under the Constitution can’t be made a reality since refugees reserve no option of freedom to work or access to work licenses. At most, they can be utilized in easygoing labour work or informal sector. This decreases their status to unimportant manikins in the hands of the State who have no methods for employment. The case laws and the Constitutional arrangements give us a feeling that there is an expectation to secure refugees yet the circumstance is obscure and exists just for records in light of the fact that genuine practices are discretionary in nature.

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) plays a very significant role in the security of refugees. The UNHCR gives various facilities that the Indian government neglects to do much of the time. Since their status and character are settled by the UNHCR office, they can get a legitimate identification, make records approving them to travel abroad, open an account in a bank, or even provide ration cards. UNHCR works together with the Central government. Whenever there is a mass flood of displaced people, UNHCR relies upon its NGOs to give data about emergencies. This causes issues in light of the fact that the greater parts of the NGOs in India are not aware of the exact number of evacuees. So UNHCR cannot support efficiently without the involvement of the country.

Other laws dealing with the issue of refugees are- Passport Act, 1967, Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939, Foreigners Act, 1946, and Foreigners Order, 1948. Passport Act, 1967 sees no difference amongst refugees and different classes of outsiders like students, economic emigrants, visitors. Thus, the refugees show a major danger of capture to migration specialists and illicit expulsion without a legitimate passport. Punishment ought not to be forced on refugees in light of the fact that they may leave in unrest not have the opportunity to get a passport. In the vast majority of the nations, access to passport officials may not be conceivable because of the absence of framework and distance.

The Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939 engages the Central Government to make rules for outsiders. Where and whom to report, provide proof of identity and registration certificate. [9]It is utilized in an unfair manner self-assertive way to trouble these refugees and there are no checks to control this force. The Foreigners Act, 1946 places some more restrictions on refugees like defining whom to meet and the routes only through which they can enter the country.[10] A major drawback of this act is limitless power given to the government to arrest and detain on sheer doubt. The Foreigners Order, 1948 approves the State government to “award or reject” an outsider entry into the Indian domain on grounds like invalid identification, unsoundness, public peace or is recognized experiencing a “loathsome” infection. This standard is discretionary on the grounds that the state of an evacuee is distinct and he has the right to be treated on empathetic grounds from the human rights point of view. Moreover, the word “loathsome has nowhere been defined in the provision.

Therefore, there is a need for laws explicitly dealing with Refugees and lays down a clear difference between foreigners and refugees.

Also Read, What to do when your mobile phone is lost or stolen.

NEED FOR LAWS SPECIFICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH REFUGEES

• The necessity of having Domestic laws for Refugees
• A national law is required in India to guarantee that all exiles are given fundamental security. Without that, the rights of refugees are not rights in the genuine sense, they are essential benefits on account of the organization.
• Domestic law should incorporate “internally displaced people” because of natural catastrophes, fear of terrorists. For example, the Kashmiris had to escape Kashmir because of the terrorist activities there.
• Lodging and employment can be guaranteed to displaced people with the goal that they can get confident.
• Various common society associations should work in a joint effort with the Government under this act to improve their everyday environments.
• A local enactment will overrule all the current demonstrations like the Passport Act and the Foreigner act and will lessen the enduring of Refugees by explicitly managing their issues.
• A local enactment will make the strategy of giving evacuee status straightforward, reasonable, and non-arbitrary. It will likewise call for more prominent responsibility and keeps an eye on the functions of the authorities.
• It will nullify segregation which right now exists among displaced people of various nationalities.
• Extraordinary arrangements ensuring security to children and women ought to be made on the grounds that in the Indian culture, crimes against children and women is at its pinnacle.
• The requirement of a South Asian Refugee Convention
• India is a superpower in Asia, so it tends to lead over different countries. In such a case drafting a South Asian Refugee show will be of extraordinary importance to guarantee protection to refugees.
• Convention can be drafted by specialists from all nations featuring their particular issues identifying the displaced people dependent on the interpretation and understanding of every country. Along these lines, the convention will represent the foundation of each nation.
• The meaning of Refugee ought to be widened to consolidate individuals dislodged due to natural catastrophes, socially excluded on account of conceding their sex and individuals escaping due to crimes against them. This can guarantee that there is no western intercession in case of managing evacuees and at the same time, greatest assurance can be given.
• The convention will book the people violating it with respect to the rights of displaced persons for wrongdoings against humankind. It can likewise define a provincial court to deal with instances of displaced people their privileges, obligations, preliminaries, and repatriation.
• This will diminish the strain between neighboring nations and improve discretionary relations. It can be worded as, “providing refuge is a humanitarian act and shall not be interpreted as infringement to the Sovereignty of the nation.”[11] It might likewise express that the Convention will not hold any state blameworthy as its solitary object is giving safe shelter to the individuals looking for it.

At the point when both the Convention and the domestic laws will become functional, there is no chance for diversion. It will have the option to address all the issues related to displaced people in the most productive way. There will be lesser assertion in techniques and still if some official attempts to stray from his obligation to offer assurance to the displaced people, he will be liable for it. Therefore, there is an urgent need to have a strong refugee system here on the grounds that refugees will come constantly to India for the reasons talked about above. The adoption of such a mechanism of law will only let a developing country like India grow and progress leaving behind its liberal approach.

---

[1] Article 1(A) (2) of the 1951 Refugee Convention. Also see Article 1, 1967 Protocol.

[2] Ranabir Samaddar(ed.), Refugees and the State. Practices of Asylum and care in India 1947-2000, (2003 edn.)

SAGE publications, UK, 2003. BS Chimni, “Status of Refugees in India” pp. 461

[3] http://chilot.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/refugee-law.pdf , pp. 22 (visited on 2^nd July, 2020).

[4] Part IV of the Geneva Convention, 1949 give protection to civilians during conflict. Common Article 3 of the

Geneva Convention is jus cogens norm which means that civilians have to be protected at all times.

[5] AIR 1981 SC 1886

[6] Article 22 of the Indian Constitution.

[7] U Myat Kayew and another v. State of Manipur and anothe, (Civil Rule No. 516 of 1991).

[8] Mr Boghy v. Union of India (Civil Rule No 1847 of 1989).

[9] R. J .S. Tahir (eds.) Ragini Trakroo Zutshi, Jayashree Satpute, Md. Saood Tahir: Refugees and the Law, 2edn,

HRLN, 2011, pp 78.

[10] Ibdi ,pp 79.

[11] Supra note 2,pp. 463